In my research, I have several areas of focus. My dissertation revolved mostly around the role of concepts in academic and political life, overall making a case to examine concepts as sites of political contestation (what I call conceptual politics). Empirically, I have traced the trials and tribulations of the soft power concept in the context of the ongoing power shift from the US and Japan to China.
Currently, I am working on three distinct projects: (1) the return of the Cold War as the main analogy to make sense of US-China relations (2) narratives and the global struggle for truth in politics and (3) domestic variations of the role of science in politics and the effects on international cooperation during crisis.
Below, please find a selection of published and ongoing work. For a complete list, please consult my CV.
How can we understand the role and consequences of concepts in international politics? Building on the emerging field of critical concept studies, the dissertation examines how actors coin, use, revisit and promote concepts in anticipation of performative effects. Examining such “conceptual politics” in practice, the dissertation advances an analysis of the “soft power” concept—the ability to affect others through attraction—in the context of the ongoing power shift between the USA, Japan and China. In addition, the study conceptualizes and empirically traces how feedback loops, reification and travel shape the trajectory of soft power.
I am currently preparing a book proposal based on the dissertation.
Winkler, S. C. (2019). “‘Soft Power is such a Benign Animal’: Narrative Power and the Reification of Concepts in Japan.”
The purpose of this article is to analyse how the seemingly natural fit between Japan and the soft power concept has been possible despite the notorious vagueness of the concept and what the consequences of soft power’s reification are. By building on recent scholarship on concepts, expert knowledge and narratives, the article suggests that reification processes are best conceptualized as driven by concept coalitions. The article finds that soft power was narrated and nurtured into Japan’s cultural diplomacy, Japan’s relationship with the United States (US) and its security policy. The article, moreover, shows that the more soft power was understood, framed and accepted as benign and necessary, the more persuasive arguments about what Japan should do or be in order to wield soft power became. This has legitimized narratives that suggest that Japan’s 'proactive contribution to peace’ as a responsible ally of the US constitutes an inevitable source of soft power.